PLEASE E-MAIL WILDABOUTAZCATS@GMAIL TO GET INVITATION TO POOL






Posts Tagged ‘Arizona’

Pac-10 vs. SEC: Who has the upper hand?

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

Pac-10 logo_editedA popular topic of discussion among Arizona fans — among Pac-10 fans, among college football fans — is how their conference is doing against other conferences.

How about this: The Pac-10 is 11-8 against the SEC this decade.

(You know which team Pac-10 fans can thank? UCLA. That’s who. The gutty little Bruins swept home-and-home series this decade against the big, bad boys from Alabama and Tennessee.)

Anyway, this is relevant this week because Arizona State plays at No. 21 Georgia on Saturday, the final chance of the decade to see how the Pac-10 and the SEC compare.

Let’s look closer at that 11-8 record. By itself, that record doesn’t mean much.

I mean, if the Pac-10 had been favored by two touchdowns in every game, that would be a horrible record. So, let’s look at the point spreads.

(more…)

What Parrom means to Miller and Arizona

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

PROJECTED 2009-2010 ARIZONA LINEUP

The UA lineup next season could look this way if Kevin Parrom signs with the Wildcats. *Wise is testing his NBA draft status without hiring an agent. **Shumpert is a walk-on who received a scholarship last year.

POSITION STARTER ROTATION PLAYER
Point guard *Nic Wise, senior Garland Judkins, sophomore; Brendon Lavender, sophomore
Shooting guard Kevin Parrom, freshman Hill; Kyle Fogg, sophomore
Center Kyryl Natyazhko, freshman Alex Jacobson, sophomore
Power forward Jamelle Horne, junior Natyazhko
Small forward Solomon Hill, freshman Parrom; **D.J. Shumpert, sophomore

After Xavier lost its Sweet 16 game to Pitt in March, Sean Miller was asked by the Cincinnati media about his thoughts of having to replace seniors C.J. Anderson and B.J. Raymond.

Let’s backtrack first: Raymond was one of Miller’s first recruits as head coach at Xavier in 2004. Anderson transferred from Manhattan for the 2007-2008 season, the same season Book Richardson was hired from New York City to be an assistant under Miller.

Raymond and Anderson, both 6-6 and 225 pound combo guard-forwards, combined to average 24 points and 9.6 rebounds in 35 games this season. Anderson was aggressive, going to the line for a team-high 173 free-throw attempts. Raymond was more finesse, leading the Musketeers with 84 three-pointers.

Knowing each of their capabilities, and what they meant to Xavier’s team as seniors, Miller indicated to the Cincinnati media that he signed an incoming recruit who reminds him of both: Kevin Parrom of South Kent (Conn.) Prep.

“He is a combination of B.J. and C.J. … who can do a little bit of everything,” said Miller, who at the time was allowed to comment on the prospect because Parrom signed a national letter of intent with Xavier.

Considering what Raymond and Anderson meant to that program, Miller’s assessment of Parrom’s capability speaks volumes.

Now fast-forward: Friday morning, Parrom will step off a plane at the Tucson International Airport and greet Miller and Richardson far away from South Kent, his Bronx home, and Cincinnati. His recruitment starts all over again in a much different place. His official visit to the UA campus this weekend will allow him to reacquaint himself with Miller and Richardson, a pair he trusted enough the first time around.

After selling Parrom on Xavier’s promise as a program of the future, Miller and Richardson will educate the young player about the Wildcats’ rich tradition and what it means to represent those who wore “ARIZONA” on their chest before him. He has gone from being a player who can light Xavier’s fire, to one with the potentially important role of carrying the torch from his UA predecessors.

Parrom, also a 6-6 combination guard-forward who is listed at 200 pounds, finds himself in an ideal recruiting situation where the program needs him as much as he needs the program. Can the same thing be said of Parrom’s outlook with Pitt, the other school competing for his services?

Pitt returns three perimeter and wing players (Jermaine Dixon, Gilbert Brown and Brad Wanamaker) who fit Parrom’s description. They each logged at least 19 minutes a game this season. Pitt has already signed 6-5 forward Lamar Patterson.

And the Panthers, who have one scholarship to give, are awaiting the decision of Kavon Lytch, a power forward from Midland (Texas) JC by way of New York City. Lytch visited Pitt last weekend before Parrom visited there. Lytch is expected to take a visit to Cincinnati soon before making a decision.

With Zane Johnson transferring out of the UA program, the Wildcats only return Kyle Fogg (24.1 minutes per game) at the off-guard position. Incoming freshman Solomon Hill will be asked to carry the load on the wing and as an occasional ball-handler.

This opens the probability that Parrom will be asked to “do a little bit of everything,” from playing on the wing to positioning inside. According to Van Coleman, the lead talent scout for Hoopmasters.com, Parrom “has good range on his jumper and is a physical finisher off the dribble. He has tools to be a real stopper at the collegiate level.”

The words “physical finisher” and “real stopper” indicates Parrom could also lend some intangible qualities to the UA. The Wildcats, now more than ever, need Parrom’s aggressive style and tough mental approach.

The overriding factor: Will Parrom be comfortable enough in Tucson to be thousands of miles from the East coast? Jarrid Famous, who prepped in Florida before playing at Westchester (N.Y.) Community College, committed to South Florida the night he returned from his UA recruiting visit because he did not want to play far from his family in Florida.

The official distance between the Bronx and Tucson is listed at 2126 miles. That may be 2126 reasons why Parrom considers Pitt more than Arizona.

The UA’s best answer to that: Richardson is from Queens, N.Y., and he uprooted his family to move to Tucson because he is thinking about his future. Miller, who ironically attended Pitt, welcomes coaching far from his Pennsylvania roots because of the prestige of the Arizona program.

Their theme: To get ahead in life, sometimes you have to move out of your comfort zone and create a new one through your mental toughness, skills and diligent work.

We should find out by the middle of next week if Parrom subscribes to that theory as well.


UA competing with Pitt again for recruit

Saturday, April 25th, 2009

Ironic isn’t it that three of Arizona’s first four recruiting challenges this spring have included new Wildcat coach Sean Miller going against his alma mater Pittsburgh?

Kevin Parrom became the most recent recruit to be courted by the Wildcats and Panthers, among others, when he told Rivals.com Friday that he has narrowed his choices to four schools: Arizona, Pitt, Virginia Tech and Xavier.
The other recruits:

  • Kyryl Natyazhko, a 6-10 center from Bradenton (Fla.) by way of the Ukraine. Result: Natyazhko signed with Arizona.
  • Jarrid Famous, 6-9 center from Westchester (N.Y.) Community College. Result: Famous signed with South Florida.

It seems ever since Miller was paired against Pitt — his hometown school which he attended with his wife — in the Sweet 16, he has been bucking heads with Jamie Dixon ever since.

Parrom is an aggressive 6-6 wing player from South Kent (Conn.) Prep who has the athleticism to go strong to the basket. He also has a long-range shooting touch. How does he fit into the plans of the Final Four that he listed to Rivals.com? Let’s take a look:

PLAYING TIME?

  • Arizona: He would join a guard-oriented unit with five returners in the backcourt, including Nic Wise if the senior-to-be returns instead of playing professionally overseas or in the NBA. But other than Wise, Kyle Fogg and Zane Johnson, playing time was sparse or non-existent for Brendon Lavender and Garland Judkins. Top-flight recruit Solomon Hill, also at 6-6, should share time at guard and on the wing. Anlaysis: Parrom can fit right into the rotation. His aggressive style of play will earn him plenty of minutes and push all the returning players to play better in practice. Miller became known at Xavier for having a roster full of 6-4 to 6-6 combo players. Xavier’s roster this season had six like that, including senior B.J. Raymond who has similar height but is a little bigger than Parrom at 6-6 and 226.
  • Pitt: The Panthers have four guards returning who averaged at least 10 minutes a game, including three (Jermaine Dixon, Gilbert Brown and Brad Wanamaker) who tallied more than 19 a game. Other than Wise, the UA had only two other guards with significant minutes returning in Fogg (24.1) and Johnson (19.1). Pitt has already signed 6-5 Lamar Patterson, rated the No. 124 prospect by Rivals.com. Analysis: The competition for playing time for Parrom will be a bit more at Pitt than Arizona. Parrom indicated to Rivals.com that he will visit Pitt on Sunday.
  • Virginia Tech: The Hokies have a couple of players at Parrom’s position returning in Dorenzo Hudson (20.6 minutes) and Terrell Bell (12.4), but their minutes do not compare to the amount of time played by Fogg and Johnson this season. In terms of immediate playing time, Virginia Tech could be the best fit for Parrom. Analysis: Parrom can come into the Hokies’ program and average more than 20 minutes a game, but what will those minutes amount to? Virginia Tech traditionally underachieves under Seth Greenberg whereas Miller has an Elite Eight and Sweet 16 appearance on his resume. Parrom has not indicated that he will officially visit Virginia Tech.
  • Xavier: Parrom has already backed out of his letter of intent with the Musketeers so it is difficult to believe he will re-sign with them. The main reason why he signed with Xavier initially was the presence of his former AAU coach Emanuel “Book” Richardson, who is now an assistant at Arizona. He has left Xavier on his list out of respect for Xavier coach Chris Mack. Parrom reportedly has indicated to Mack that Xavier is still an option; he just wants to see what else is out there.

In the end: The recruitment of Parrom should boil down to Arizona and Pitt. Richardson was successful in recruiting Parrom to Xavier; chances are he will have the same success at Arizona with a more renowned program than the Musketeers. Arizona at times next season could have its three freshmen on the court at the same time — Hill, Natyazhko and Parrom — for extended minutes and they can be the nucleus for the future.

The fresh direction of the program under a new coach and the youngest staff in the Pac-10 can only be exciting for Parrom. How about this lineup at times?: Wise at point guard, Parrom at the off-guard, Hill at wing forward, Horne at power forward and Natyazhko at the post. That’s an athletic lineup that can run and play defense. Add to it the hustle of Fogg, shooting of Johnson and likely improvement from Judkins, Lavender and Jacobson, and it has the makings of a decent team in Miller’s first year. It just might be good enough to entice Wise to return instead of going to Europe.

UCLA recruit reportedly interested in UA. As has been discussed on this blog, Coast2Coast Recruiting is reporting a rumor that Tyler Lamb is reconsidering his verbal commitment to UCLA and might be interested in Arizona.

As with any rumor, you have to be careful about its validity. Lamb, a 6-3 shooting guard rated by Rivals.com as the No. 99 player of the Class of 2010, was offered a scholarship by Lute Olson and his staff before the start of this season. He committed to UCLA last September.

The Bruins did not recruit a shooting guard for the Class of 2009, so if Lamb is reconsidering his verbal commitment, it has nothing to do with the Bruins and his potential playing time. It would only be because other Mater Dei (Calif.) prospects have thrived at Arizona and the Wildcats now have an accomplished young coach in Miller.

But a rumor is a rumor until proven otherwise.

15 reasons why Arizona rivals Louisville during Pitino era

Friday, March 27th, 2009

The historian has a point that the basketball tradition at Louisville is superior to Arizona, but that’s going back to the Denny Crum era, long before any of the players in Friday’s game were born.

Focusing on the Rick Pitino era at Louisville, since his hire in 2001-02, the fortunes of the Cardinals’ program are slightly better than the Wildcats’ success in 15 different categories. Louisville’s strengths are in its deeper NCAA tournament runs, overall victories and its value/operating income.

The Wildcats have a clear advantage in personnel development, as evidenced by Lute Olson producing four (Jerryd Bayless, Channing Frye, Luke Walton and Andre Iguodala) current NBA players since 2002 as opposed to Pitino’s one (Francisco Garcia).

Arizona also has two consensus All-Americans, who were selected in either the first or second teams, since 2001-02, while Louisville has zero.

And while rating the two programs since Pitino arrived in Louisville eight years ago, keep in mind that the UA has operated with interim coaching staffs the last two seasons. Here is the tally:

UA VS. LOUISVILLE: PROGRAM STRENGTH SINCE 2001-2002

CATEGORY UA UL SYNOPSIS
Head coach   X Olson out last two seasons
Overall victories   X UL's 199 vs. UA's 182
Head-to-head X   UA beat UL in 2006-07
NCAA tourney appearances X   UA in every year; UL in 2006 NIT
Sweet 16 appearances X   UA's 4 vs. UL's 3
Elite Eight appearances   X UL's 3 vs. UA's 2
Final Four appearances   X UL's 1 vs. UA's 0
Conference titles EVEN EVEN Each has 2 titles
Practice facility EVEN EVEN UA opened new facility this year. UL opened its facility in 2007.
Arena   X UL plays in storied Freedom Hall. It will play in new 22,000-seat arena starting in 2010.
Attendance EVEN EVEN Both schools sellout routinely
Value/Revenue   X UL No. 3 on Forbes' list. UA is No. 6.
Graduation rate   X UL's 42 percent better than UA's 20 percent but it's still in lower percentile of NCAA tourney teams
Consensus All-Americans X   UA had two second-teamers: Jason Gardner (2003) and Salim Stoudamire (2005). UL none.
NBA players X   UA 4 active players drafted after 2001-02. UL only one.
TOTALS 5 7 UL holds a 7-5-3 advantage. UA can close the gap by winning and balancing the Elite Eight appearances to three apiece. On the other hand, UL can take a point away from UA by balancing the head-to-head with a win.