Q&A of those in the know: Greg Hansen
Monday, April 13th, 2009UPDATE: The hiring of Chris Mack at Xavier opened the door for Ohio State assistant coach Archie Miller (brother of head coach Sean Miller) to join the UA’s staff. Although Reggie Geary would have been a fine choice, Archie Miller comes with some great credentials. Buckeyes coach Thad Matta considered him one of his lead recruiters.
From time to time, we will be reaching out to members of the media, who either cover UA basketball or college basketball in general, for their insights on what is going on at McKale Center and elsewhere. Today, Arizona Daily Star sports columnist Greg Hansen has agreed to answer five of our questions that pertain to new UA coach Sean Miller and the Wildcats.
READ GREG HANSEN’S LATEST COLUMN AND BLOG AT AZSTARNET.COM
Q: UA athletic director Jim Livengood denied to you that his hiring of Miller will be his legacy. Do you agree or disagree? After the John Mackovic, Mike Stoops and now Miller hirings, what do you think Livengood will be most remembered for?
Hansen: If Miller indeed restores the program and maintains its excellence, I think the hire of Mackovic will be washed away. In all other areas — student relations, facilities building, financial responsibility, I think Livengood is among the elite ADs in the country. The Mackovic hire is his only serious blemish. The Lute (Olson) stuff, while on Livengood’s watch, is easily understood. No one had the power to force Lute to step away a year or two earlier. So I think Livengood’s legacy will be that he took Dempsey’s outstanding athletic department, which was hitting on all cylinders, and maintained it.
Q: How long do you think it will take Miller to have Arizona be at least a Sweet Sixteen team?
Hansen: By the looks of his first five days of recruiting, I would think by his second season the UA would return to the NCAA tournament, and by Year Three, Arizona might be positioned to win a game or two in the tournament.
Q: What is the worst-case scenario for Miller’s first season? The best-case scenario?
Hansen: Worst case right now is if Nic Wise doesn’t return and then it’s a 6-22 disaster. But if Wise is back, I suspect they’ll be able to go about 14-14 and maybe 6-12 in a weaker Pac-10. Best case: Probably a game or two over .500 (maybe 16-14) and close to (.500) in the Pac-10. Hard to call without recruiting being completed.
Q: What are your thoughts of how the national media perceived the Arizona program to be, some of them saying that UA basketball went as far as Olson could take it?
Hansen: Arizona basically was Lute-less from the day it lost to Illinois in the 2005 Elite Eight. So I think the transition period has hit bottom without really experiencing a disaster season. If they can continue winning 20-some games since 2005, to me it is a sign that the program is indeed among the national elite and has a chance to get back to the 1988-2005 levels in three years and certainly in four.
Q: If you were Pac-10 commissioner for a day, what would be the one thing you would change about the conference in terms of basketball?
Hansen: I might toy with the Thursday-Saturday rotation in league games, moving games to other days of the week in attempt to get some ESPN coverage regularly on say Wednesday and Sunday. But the Fox deal pays more than any ESPN connection so I don’t see them changing. Of course, I’d love to see the Pac-10 tournament rotate to Washington, Oregon, Arizona and Northern Cal instead of being stuck in the apathetic Staples Center.
UAHOOPSCOACH.COM ANALYSIS:
Livengood’s overall legacy at Arizona will be favorable. Some might argue that Livengood’s ability as an athletic director should be questioned for three reasons: His unsuccessful courting of Tim Floyd after five months of knowing he needed a replacement for Olson, his overzealousness to announce Kevin O’Neill would take over the program, and his hiring of Mackovic. However, you won’t find an athletic department head in the country who cares about his operations and its staff more than Livengood. He was able to land a young coach the caliber of Miller. That makes him a winner more than a loser.
We share Hansen’s outlook for next season. If the UA somehow has a better than .500 record overall and in the Pac-10, Miller deserves to be the conference coach of the year. Yes, the Pac-10 does not seem to be too challenging next season outside of Cal, Washington, UCLA and USC. But you know teams such as Stanford and Oregon State will be better now that Johnny Dawkins and Craig Robinson will have their system in place. Oregon should be more competitive with its young players returning. ASU will always be a difficult task with Herb Sendek there. WSU is a mystery but the Cougs have talented young players (Klay Thompson, Marcus Capers and DeAngelo Casto) and a decent coach in Ken Bone. …
With the lack of quality depth at every position next season, Miller won’t hit his stride most likely until the 2010-11 season after two successful recruiting efforts including the crop from this spring. …
Please Pac-10 consider moving your conference tournament out of Los Angeles and into Las Vegas. If the West Coast Conference can play its conference tourney in Sin City, why can’t the Pac-10? The Mountain West already has its tourney in Las Vegas with UNLV as its host. WCC held its tourney in Las Vegas for the first time this season. If the Pac-10 ever considers a move to Las Vegas, it would be a true neutral site and more fans from each school would attend because of the lure of Las Vegas. Problem is, with the Mountain West having their tourney at the same time, it will be logistically difficult. The WCC has its tourney a week before the Mountain West’s tournament at a different venue than Thomas and Mack: The Orleans Casino arena.
















