Your Questions of the Week: Requirements for foreign athletes?
Monday, May 11th, 2009FROM DENVERITE: I am curious how the NCAA academic eligibility works for non-U.S. collegiate players in general and (UA recruit) Kyryl Natyazhko specifically. What are the NCAA academic requirements for such athletes? In Kyryl’s case, he attended IMG for 1 year. Did he get a high school diploma there? Or did he graduate from high school in Ukraine and his academic standing is translated into U.S. credits? Are the academic eligibility requirements different for a U.S.-originating student athlete versus an international student?
ANSWER: Denverite, the minimum requirements are actually quite similar to an athlete from the U.S. in regards to the SAT or ACT and at least a 2.00 grade-point average (GPA). The NCAA sets minimum academic requirements in relation to a foreign student’s education in their home country. In Natyazhko’s case, in addition to his grades at IMG Academy since last summer, he must submit to the NCAA Clearinghouse his transcript from when he attended high school in Ukraine. Natyazhko indicated to me that he will receive his diploma from IMG, and he is in good academic standing. All international players must pass the SAT or ACT to become eligible, which is no different than what Americans must achieve. The NCAA does not accept the foreign equivalency of the SAT or ACT. The NCAA sets GPA requirements for students from more than 145 countries, including Ukraine. That country uses a number system for grades as opposed to America’s letter-grade system. A 5 is the U.S. equivalent of an A, a 4 is equal to a B, etc. The NCAA Clearinghouse translates those grades for their assessment. The GPA must be at least 2.00 for the foreign student to qualify.
FROM RB: Any way to find out if the UA will maintain its strict closed practice policy under Sean Miller? I was an avid practice viewer both in my days as a student, and after that up until they closed them in 2001 or so. It would be nice if they at least opened them for pre-season practices. The weekend scrimmages are nice, but I enjoyed much of the drill work, as well.
ANSWER: Now that the UA practices in the Richard Jefferson Practice Facility the general public can not view the Cats’ workouts. A suggestion: Pop in to McKale Center from time to time in the afternoon and you might find UA players shooting or playing a pickup game, if the Jefferson facility is being utilized. I understand where you are coming from. When I attended the UA 20 years ago, I would make it a routine to study or eat a snack in McKale Center while the Wildcats practiced. I also enjoyed attending those Dick Tomey brown-bag lunch gatherings when he showed game film to fans and answered questions. Sorry for getting sidetracked but I was going down memory lane.
FROM UNKNOWN: Arizona still has one game to fill in the non-conference portion of their 2009-2010 schedule. So, is it possible that Coach Miller will schedule a one-for-one with a Big East team near the NYC area this season? Say, a Seton Hall, St. John’s or Rutgers? In your interview with Parrom, Kevin mentioned it would be nice to play a game back East.
ANSWER: UA administrator Ryan Hansen, who puts together the UA’s non-conference schedule, has mentioned that scheduling teams in that region is a possibility if it works for both sides. That will not happen this year because the opponent the UA will play is a “money-game” opponent — a low mid-major (similar to Loyola Marymount this season). I know in the past, Lute Olson tried to accomodate players he recruited in different regions by scheduling home-and-home games in that area, i.e. A.J. Bramlett playing at New Mexico, and all the guys from Houston (Joe Blair, Juwaan McClellan, Nic Wise) playing in that city.
FROM UNKNOWN: I was wondering if you have any info on whether Miller might go after Latavius Williams, now that he has decided to open things back up a little more. He is listed as a top power forward and we could use more depth at that position.
ANSWER: Williams is not in Arizona’s plans. He is to decide between Memphis, Georgetown, Florida International and Kansas State. Here’s hoping Josh Pastner gets him because Pastner deserves good news after all the player defections.
FROM BILL:Who do you think is the highest rated prospect in the 2010 class that is going to realistically be a Wildcat? My money is on Daniel Alexander.
ANSWER: Alexander would be a great get. But he was more of an Olson recruit than a Miller recruit now. Miller is still pursuing because of Alexander’s high rating among talent scouts (No. 29 overall in the Class of 2010 by Rivals.com). Alexander is also listed as a 6-8 power forward, one of the UA’s greatest needs heading into the 2010-2011 season. Rivals.com is reporting that Oklahoma offered him a scholarship last week. Texas A&M has also offered. Alexander is also a Wildcat fan, from what I understand, and his AAU coach is a good friend of Olson and Russ Pennell. It’s in Miller’s court. I think if he wants Alexander, he gets him. Don’t count out 6-9 small forward Dominique Ferguson of Indianapolis as the highest rated prospect to sign with the UA. He is rated No. 6 overall by Rivals.com. He has talked about how he likes Arizona’s program and the fact that Jason Gardner had a good career with the Wildcats after moving to Tucson from Indianapolis. Rivals.com lists Arizona as one of the schools that has offered a scholarship to Ferguson. Kentucky and Tennessee are the others.
FROM JAMES: Do you know if Miller is trying to schedule some late summer exhibition games in another country? We did this in Australia in 1997, then again in Canada a few years back. I think it would be fantastic if this team had a few games under their belt heading into the first game in November.
ANSWER: NCAA rules permit teams to travel internationally every four years for exhibition games. The UA played in Canada in September 2006 after a trip to Europe in May was canceled. So the UA can take a trip next year, and I’d expect that to happen, especially at the same time as the Cats played in 2006 so the freshmen can travel as well.
FROM UNKNOWN: As of right now, the Cats have three signed recruits for 2009, Kevin Parrom, Solomon Hill, and Natyazhko. Of the three, who do you see contributing the most in the upcoming season? And do you foresee the potential success of the these three recruits leading to transfers of current players?
ANSWER: You will likely see the most minutes come from Hill because he can play at three different areas — ball-handler, shooting guard and wing — and he is a strong inside defender. Parrom and Natyazhko will play important minutes as well. Parrom is versatile as a lock-down defender on the wing and he is improving his perimeter game. Natyazhko gives the UA added depth in the frontcourt that is sorely needed. A lot will be asked from the Ukrainian freshman and he has the work ethic to have good results. I don’t believe you will see the returners at those positions transfer (Kyle Fogg and Alex Jacobson). Fogg will get his share of minutes and Jacobson is working hard this off-season to trim down a little to get some more foot speed. He can be a good defender inside.
That’s it for this week. If you get your questions in on time by Wednesday, I will try to the best of my ability to get an answer by the following Monday or Tuesday. You can pose your questions via the “Contact Us” page. Thank you for your questions and contribution to this site.
BEAR DOWN















